Maybe a couple more?Note I was going to do a Glamour high/low, but seeing as they too put Miley Cyrus on their cover, I'd probably sound redundant. All I have to say is Glamour you are a WOMAN'S magazine. Sure, teenagers read it, but Miley is still UNDERAGE. That whole section you have in your magazine, you know, Sex & Love, should not even technically apply to her yet. If you can't even technically relate to the whole magazine, you should definitely NOT be on the cover. And "America's Most Famous Girl Grows Up." Really? Okay 1) She's not America's most famous girl, because if she was, than I could see why most countries hate us, and 2) She's younger than me. She is NOT grown up. Are you kidding me? Uhh, maybe I'm just being too judgemental, but whatever. All I can say is thank goodness I cancelled my subscription to Glamour a loong time ago.
6 comments:
oh i can't wait to see more low ones haha
oops.. that teen vogue cover looks really bland, what happened to them???
btw, thank a lot for your last comment,, that's sooooo sweet and kind of you. :)
i get a million magazines too.
I agree, there are SO many options for cover models, why repeat?
agree with you on the teen vogue, it's not quite up to the "vogue" standard!! :)
Hmm, I agree with you about the Vogue cover. It was a great article, but definitely an "eh" cover. Just rather boring.
Oh I like these evaluations. And I really didn't like the Teen Vogue cover, although I have to say, the inside editorial was fantastic!
Post a Comment